Hi Nancy pet,,
Thanks so much will do pet,,,,,
Right,, I've got a reply from,at last a proper scientist,, I'll post it below for all to read,,,,,,,
Dear friends of ospreys,
I'm working as a senior advisor and head of the biodiversity group in North
Ostrobothnia regional Environment Centre (NOREC). Our centre is the legal
regional authority concerning bird protection under Finnish Nature Conservation
Act.
We have lately received several emails concerning the injured young osprey in
Hailuoto webcam nest. We have been asked to save the bird, take it to the bird
hospital/zoo, or even to euthanize it. It has been fine to see, how much people
around the world really do care about the birds.
However, so far our opinion has been that the best we can do is to leave the
young osprey alone. That does not mean we wouldn't care about the welfare of the
b
ird; as any friend of the nature, we feel sorry for him too.
I have emailed and discussed with several experts about the osprey;
ornithologists, osprey researchers and veterinarian who is expert in wild
animals (in Helsinki Zoo, which is the leading organization what comes to the
care of the injured wild animals in Finland).
All the experts do have the same opinion: right now the best thing we can do is
to do nothing. The osprey really gets the best care it can ever have.
There is no bird hospital in Finland which could take good care of the ospreys:
they don't do well in captivity, even there might be some single positive
examples. The policy in wildlife care in Helsinki Zoo is that an animal is been
taken to the zoo only if it can be cured and returned to the nature or if there
can be found a zoo or another place which meets the specific requirements of the
species.
Otherwise the animal is euthanised, which is of course the most merciful thing
to do in that kind of situation. But as said, for ospreys there are not suitable
places in Finland, so the only alternative in this case would be euthanasia. The
injured leg cannot be healed either.
And even if we think the zoo or similar place could be a fine solution, it might
not be so from the bird's point of view. It is not easy for the wild animals to
get used to captivity, they are easily stressed. For example it has been=2
0
researched that stress hormone levels of the captivated birds are often high for
a long time, indicating hard life. We also think dying of hunger would be
terrible, but actually it is not painful at all, just fading away. And the truth
is, animals don't think and feel like we humans do.
There is also the question when we should intervene: if the bird would really
suffer and be in pain, then we should react even according to the Nature
Conservation Act. So far the chick is doing well in nest, eating (salmon today)
and wingercising. Normal risk of being predated does not give us the right to
take the wild animal from nest into stressful captivity.
In general, predation, diseases and accidents are a normal life in the nature,
and reacting to one single case does not change the fact there are thousands of
other similar, even worse cases. This is the problem of webcams, they show life
as it is. As ecologists we should understand that this is how the nature works.
In this nest there is already two young birds flying, which is actually a good
situation.
The future of the young osprey is still open: we do not yet know, if it is able
to fly and leave the nest, perhaps not, but let us give the chick a chance. In
NOREC we will follow the situation and if it seems the chick will not survive,
we'll re-consider our actions.
But for now, we will let the young osprey live free life20worth wild osprey.
Sincerely Yours,
Tupuna Kovanen
Pohjois-Pohjanmaan ympäristökeskus/North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment
Centre
ylitarkastaja, monimuotoisuusryhmän päällikkö/Senior Advisor, head of the
biodiversity group
gsm: +358-40-7244 756
Chrissy
XXXXX